Creation and Modern Science

September 20, 2006 — 1 Comment

The popular scientific approach to the origin of the universe is naturalistic evolution. The basic assumption is that the world, as we know it, is an advanced development of a process that began billions, trillions, or even more years ago. The concept is that everything began from small, microscopic atoms mutating into more advanced structures, out of which the universe eventually was formed through the Big Bang.

The doctrine of creation is the evangelical answer to the beginnings of man and the universe. The basic concept is that God created the universe ex nihilo, out of nothing. There are, however, tensions between creationism and science, especially in the arena of the age of the cosmos. There are five primary theories which attempt to harmonize this tension.

The first theory is the gap theory, which holds that there was an extended gap of time between God’s creation of the earth and the universe and the six days of creation listed in Genesis. The second theory is the flood theory, which holds that the force of the great flood in the days of Noah accomplished what would naturally take billions of years. The third theory is the ideal-time theory, which states that God created the world in six literal days, but he created it in an aged fashion. That is, he created it as if it were billions of years old. The fourth theory is the age-day theory, which holds that the word “days” in Genesis does not refer to literal days, but an extended period of time. The fifth and final theory is the pictorial-day theory, which holds that the days described in Genesis are a logical structuring, not a chronological one.

Kevin

Posts

One response to Creation and Modern Science

  1. Could you explain that fifth theory a bit more? And apropos of creation, I’ve been reading various online comments of the religious theories of Calvin. (I’m a Presbyterian and didn’t know all that about “total inability to receive God’s grace, etc.”!) The person who was refuting all that was quite convincing…but what seems strange to me in all the talk about “original sin” and “the fall of man through Adam” etc. is that no reference is made to those millions of years before man even appeared on earth. Surely, that has to be taken into account. Those religious theories always seem to start with Adam and Eve in the Garden of Edon, which, if in any way true, would only have been …let’s say…100,000 or maybe 200,000 years ago. And even then, man just didn’t pop up out of nowehre, created by God or not. If you don’t believe in evolution, then that’s a different story, but I believe both in evolution and whatever the Bible is trying to say about the first appearance of man. That’s when your five theories of creation come into play. What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*