Why Steve Nash is Not the MVP

April 12, 2006 — 1 Comment

Last year, everyone was blown away by the Phoenix Suns. Adding Steve Nash as their point guard, coupled with Amare Stoudemire having a breakout season, catapulted them to the best record in the NBA. They were the darling team in the media. They scored a lot of points and had a lot of fun doing it. I had no problems with Nash being the MVP last year.

This year, however, I don’t think he deserves it. There are a lot of people who will argue that Nash kept the Suns together with Stoudemire being hurt all year. There is some truth to that, but I don’t think Steve Nash is even the Suns best player this year. Shawn Marion has kept that team alive. The problem I have with giving Nash the MVP this year is that he is overated based on the system that the Suns run.

Let me go through some stats. The Suns average 87.4 FGA per game, of which 25.6 are three-pointers. Those are both the highest among the NBA. The next closest FGA is the Charlotte Bobcats (83.4) and the average for the league is about 79-80. The Suns attempt the highest percentage (29%) of their field goal attempts behind the three point line. They are dead last in free throw attempts per game (18.1), with the next closest team (the mighty Toronto Raptors) attempting five more per game. They are also dead last in offensive rebounds per game (9.4).

They do have some really bright points. They are the most accurate team shooting three pointers (39.2%) and second in overall field goal accuracy (47.8%). They’re third in defensive rebounds (32.1), and first in assists (26.6) and points per game (108.3).

In case you’re having trouble grasping the big picture, the Suns are trying to beat you by shooting more shots and beating you in transition. They don’t make an effort to get the ball down low or to get to the free throw line. If they have a somewhat-open shot (especially behind the three point line) they’re going to fire it up. They have people who can make jump shots and they base their entire gameplan on using them.

They remind me a lot of a college team. Watching the NCAA tournament, I was shocked by how often teams would launch (and hit) three pointers. I could tell that some of the players were only on the team because they could hit the three and that was about it. If you’re one-dimensional in college, most NBA teams will pass on you.

What does all this have to do with Nash not deserving the MVP? I believe that the reason Nash is so successful and puts up the big numbers is because he is in a system that rewards people with his skill set. However, if you put almost any other starting point guard in the Suns starting lineup they would do almost just as well. If you look back to the 2003-04 season (the year before Nash arrived), Stephon Marbury put up huge numbers (20.8 ppg, 8.3 apg) for the Suns. The biggest difference between him and Nash is that Marbury is a shoot first, selfish player. In most systems, that doesn’t work well for the point guard. This is especially true in the Suns up-tempo, run-and-gun style.

I think the reason the Suns have done so well these past two seasons is teams just aren’t used to the style they play. Most of the time you don’t have to worry about the other team shooting a three pointer 1.7 seconds after your team just missed a shot. Like I pointed out before, the Suns are most interested in making shots from the outside. Nash just has to find the open player and get him the ball. To me, that is not what being the MVP is all about.

Kevin

Posts

One response to Why Steve Nash is Not the MVP

  1. Hmm, have to disagree with your assessment, Sug. While I do not necessarily think that Nash is the “hands-down” MVP, I believe your criteria is somewhat flawed (secretly, I believe you are biased toward him because of his former Maverick ties, but that is a conspiracy theory for another time).

    I find it interesting that you stated:

    “The Suns are most interested in making shots from the outside. Nash just has to find the open player and get him the ball.”

    If I have a guy that can get the ball to guys for open threes and those guys are adept at making them, wouldn’t I want that guy to continue to do that? If my team is making threes over and over, isn’t that better than the other guy making twos? I understand, when playoff time rolls around, the game changes, but then, we aren’t talking about the MVP of the playoffs.

    While I agree that the system he plays in rewards his “skill set”, I believe that the discussion is a classic “chicken or the egg” argument. I would contend that it is Nash’s abilities and “skill set” that creates the reward opportunities and thus, gives his team the best opportunity to win as many games as possible.

    Couldn’t the same argument be used for Dirk’s inclusion in MVP talk. His skill set is also unique. He is a product of a system that takes advantage of his rare combination of height, ball-handling ability, and shooting range. Like Nash, the team philosophy revolves around his “skill set” to try to put the team in the best position to win every night.

    As a point of verification in Nash’s case, the Suns have spent the whole season without arguably one to the best, young big men in the league on IR, yet they continue to score consistently and win regularly … does anyone really believe that Boris Diaw is the reason that they have lost so little in Amare’s absence? No. I think it points directly at Nash’s ability to orchestrate the players that are out there with his creativeness, his dogged desire to push the tempo, and his willingness to draw defensive attention to himself, freeing others for open shots.

    See, I think he would go to a team like the Knicks (with the aforementioned Marbury) and, while I doubt that they would become world-beaters, I believe they might be much better and assuredly would end up running up and down the court more often because of Nash’s drive to push the tempo and create scoring opportunities (He is not unlike Jason Kidd in this fact. You know … except for the fact that Kidd shoots like the friend of Ben Stiller’s character in Along Came Polly and Nash shoots like Jimmy Chitwood from Hoosiers).

    Would Nash win a one-on-one match up with other MVP candidates? Probably not. Does his ability translate into long-term success in the playoffs? I don’t believe so, but as I mentioned earlier, this award is for the MVP of the regular season.

    In the end, do I think that Nash is the MVP? Not sure, but I believe he has a stronger claim to it you have assessed. He is not just a product of their offensive system. I believe the Suns offense is a product of his ability and value as a player/floor manager.

Leave a Reply

Text formatting is available via select HTML. <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*